Massospora cicadina is a fungal pathogen that infects only 13 and 17 year periodical cicadas. Infection results in a “plug” of spores that replaces the end of the cicada’s abdomen while it is still alive, leading to infertility, disease transmission, and eventual death of the cicada.

Systematics[edit]

M. cicadina belongs to the phylum Zoopagomycota, subphylum Entomophthoromycota, and order Entomophthorales. About a dozen other species of Massospora are known, each of which attacks a specific species of cicada.

Discovery[edit]

M. cicadina was first observed by Leidy in 1850 but was not described until 1879 by Charles Horton Peck. Peck placed the fungus among the class Coniomycetes, but in 1888 Thaxter and Forbes placed it instead in Entomophthoraceae. It wasn’t until 1921 that the pathogen’s microscopic characteristics were thoroughly studied by Speare,[1] who found that conidia germinate quickly when placed in a nutrient substance.[2]

M. cicadina infects Magicicada species, which are 13 and 17-year periodical cicadas. Magicicada species spend most of their lives underground as nymphs, feeding on xylem fluids of tree roots.[3] They dig upwards through the soil to molt into adults and emerge above ground after 13 or 17 years. Adult periodical cicadas live only for 4 to 6 weeks, to mate and deposit their eggs. Females attract males for mating by flicking their wings, while males produce a mating call. After mating, female cicadas deposit up to 600 or more eggs in V-shaped cuts on tree roots (usually 20 eggs at a time in each cut).[3]

Life cycle[edit]

Spores of M. cicadina are capable of germinating and infecting cicadas at as little as one year but may remain dormant for either 13 or 17 years before becoming active. This synchronous cycle corresponds with local periods of cicada emergence. M. cicadina is thought to be the only pathogen that coincides with its host’s 17-year life cycle; because of this it is considered to have the longest life cycle of any fungus.[4][5]M. cicadina resting spores do not require a dormant period: They are capable of germinating and infecting periodical cicadas after less than a year from their introduction into soil. Cicadas are believed to become infected by fungal spores as the nymphs dig tunnels to the soil surface days before their emergence as adults.[5][6]

Infection[edit]

Stage I infection[edit]

Initial infection takes place while cicada nymphs dig their way to the surface of the soil before emerging as adults.[5][6] It is presumed that the emerging cicadas are infected by resting spores they encounter in the soil. In early stages of infection, hyphal bodies of the fungus are found in the host tissues. Later, Stage I infected adult cicadas produce haploid conidia, forming the asexual stage of the fungus.[4] Conidia produced by Stage I infected cicadas are capable of infecting other adult cicadas. There is no difference between the proportion of male to female nymphs being infected by spores in this stage.[7] In the early stages of Stage I infection, the infection is completely concealed inside the abdomen of the cicada. Some time before the death of the host, the rear segments of the abdomen fall off, revealing a white, chalky mass or “plug” of the fungus, which produces spores. Because of this method of spreading of Stage I spores, cicadas infected with M. cicadina have been referred to as “flying salt shakers of death”. Infected cicadas are infertile.

Stage I infected cicadas are observed to spend more time walking around and dragging their abdomen, which may aid in spreading conidia that infect other cicadas. This behavioral change is thought to be the result of a fungal extended phenotype, the physical afflictions of the infected cicadas, or the general phenology of cicada life cycles.[5] Progression in male and female cicadas is similar, including the time elapsed before the abdominal segments fall off.[7] Stage I infected males respond to mating calls of both males and females and attract healthy males through flicking their wings, a behavior only observed in healthy females. This altered behavior aids in infection of healthy cicadas.[5] Stage I infected males also tolerate mounting from courting males, suggesting that M. cicadina alters insect sexual behavior to increase infection rates.[4]

The fruiting bodies of M. cicadina on Stage I infected adult cicadas, are observed to possess a substituted amphetamine alkaloid, cathinone.[8]

Stage II infection[edit]

Cicadas that come into contact with conidia from an infected adult cicada contract Stage II infection. During Stage II infection, the fungus produces a different kind of spore: resting spores that have thick, ornamented walls and are not directly infectious to adult cicadas. Instead, the resting spores lie dormant in soil and will infect the next generation of cicadas during their next 13 or 17 year emergence from the soil.[1]

The fungus renders both males and females sterile, though the insect may remain alive and mobile while discharging spores. Infected cicadas display some normal behavior such as sexual responsiveness, and even copulation between infected and healthy cicadas has been observed.[1] As cicada males form large chorus centers during mating, the infection rate of males with the resting spore stage is typically higher than infected females at this stage.[4] Conidia that fill the abdomens of infected males at this stage also alter the pitch of their mating call, resulting in them sounding smaller than they actually are to females, which may also contribute to the prevalence of higher infection rates in males than in females.[4]

Habitat[edit]

Species of the genus Massospora are found in the same habitats as their host cicadas, which includes large temperate ranges in the Southern and Northern hemispheres.

Benefits[edit]

The density of cicadas over one 17-year cicada emergence period was found in one study to have dropped by one half due to infections from the fungus, while the number of infected cicadas producing resting spores increased by 9-fold.[7] This suggests the fungus can be utilized as a control agent in decreasing the significant damage cicadas impose on tree roots on which they lay their eggs.[6] Studies of M. cicadina and its hosts can also provide insights into biological clocks and environmental signaling due to their long, synchronous life cycles.

Similar host–parasite systems[edit]

Another parasite that hijacks host sexual behavior is Massospora levispora, a pathogen of the annual cicada Okanagana rimosa.’[4]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Speare, A. T. (1921). “Massospora cicadina Peck: A Fungous Parasite of the Periodical Cicada”. Mycologia. 13 (2): 72–82. doi:10.2307/3753297. JSTOR 3753297.
  2. ^ Edward., Steinhaus (2014). Insect Pathology V2 An Advanced Treatise. Elsevier Science. ISBN 9780323143172. OCLC 1044715985.
  3. ^ a b Williams, K S; Simon, C (1995). “The Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution of Periodical Cicadas”. Annual Review of Entomology. 40 (1): 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413. ISSN 0066-4170.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Duke, L.; Steinkraus, D.C; English, J.E; Smith, K.G (2002-05-01). “Infectivity of resting spores of Massospora cicadina (Entomophthorales: Entomophthoraceae), an entomopathogenic fungus of periodical cicadas (Magicicada spp.) (Homoptera: Cicadidae)”. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 80 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00040-X. ISSN 0022-2011. PMID 12234535.
  5. ^ a b c d e Cooley, John R.; Marshall, David C.; Hill, Kathy B. R. (2018-01-23). “A specialized fungal parasite (Massospora cicadina) hijacks the sexual signals of periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)”. Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 1432. Bibcode:2018NatSR…8.1432C. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19813-0. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5780379. PMID 29362478.
  6. ^ a b c “Flying salt shakers of death :Cornell Mushroom Blog”. blog.mycology.cornell.edu. Retrieved 2018-10-23.
  7. ^ a b c White, Joann; Lloyd, Monte (1983-08-01). “A Pathogenic Fungus, Massospora cicadina Peck (Entomophthorales), in Emerging Nymphs of Periodical Cicadas1 (Homoptera: Cicadidae)”. Environmental Entomology. 12 (4): 1245–1252. doi:10.1093/ee/12.4.1245. ISSN 1938-2936.
  8. ^ Boyce, Greg R.; Gluck-Thaler, Emile; Slot, Jason C.; Stajich, Jason E.; Davis, William J.; James, Tim Y.; Cooley, John R.; Panaccione, Daniel G.; Eilenberg, Jørgen; De Fine Licht, Henrik H.; Macias, Angie M. (October 2019). “Psychoactive plant- and mushroom-associated alkaloids from two behavior modifying cicada pathogens”. Fungal Ecology. 41: 147–164. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2019.06.002. PMC 6876628. PMID 31768192.

External links[edit]




Source link